How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Papua New Guinea?

34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Belarus

0.0006 million USD per person

in 2024

Papua New Guinea

0.0006 million USD per person

in 2024

Belarus rank

64th

Papua New Guinea rank

65th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Belarus
Papua New Guinea

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0006 million USD per person against 0.0006 million USD per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 64th and Papua New Guinea ranks 65th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Papua New Guinea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Papua New Guinea
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Belarus
2010s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Belarus
2020s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Belarus or Papua New Guinea?: Belarus, at 0.0006 million USD per person against 0.0006 million USD per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Belarus and Papua New Guinea?: 0 million USD per person, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Papua New Guinea?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Papua New Guinea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Belarus ranks 64th and Papua New Guinea ranks 65th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/belarus/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/belarus/papua-new-guinea/">Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.