How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Palau?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cayman Islands vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Cayman Islands

0.0005 million USD per person

in 2024

Palau

0.0005 million USD per person

in 2024

Cayman Islands rank

87th

Palau rank

85th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Cayman Islands
Palau

How they compare

Palau currently reports 0.0005 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 87th and Palau ranks 85th of 180 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cayman Islands	Palau	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Palau
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	Palau
1990s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	Palau
2000s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Palau
2010s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Palau
2020s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Cayman Islands or Palau?: Palau, at 0.0005 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Cayman Islands and Palau?: 0 million USD per person, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Palau?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Cayman Islands and Palau rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Cayman Islands ranks 87th and Palau ranks 85th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/cayman-islands/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/cayman-islands/palau/">Cayman Islands vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.