How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Chile

0.0007 million USD per person

in 2024

Costa Rica

0.0007 million USD per person

in 2024

Chile rank

42nd

Costa Rica rank

40th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Chile
Costa Rica

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0007 million USD per person against 0.0007 million USD per person in Chile, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Chile ranks 42nd and Costa Rica ranks 40th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Costa Rica	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Costa Rica
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Costa Rica
1990s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Costa Rica
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Costa Rica
2010s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Chile
2020s	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Chile or Costa Rica?: Costa Rica, at 0.0007 million USD per person against 0.0007 million USD per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Chile and Costa Rica?: 0 million USD per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Chile ranks 42nd and Costa Rica ranks 40th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.