How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Luxembourg: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Congo

0.0002 million USD per person

in 2024

Luxembourg

0.0003 million USD per person

in 2024

Congo rank

140th

Luxembourg rank

137th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Congo
Luxembourg

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0002 million USD per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per person.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 140th and Luxembourg ranks 137th of 180 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Luxembourg	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Luxembourg
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Luxembourg
1990s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Luxembourg
2000s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Luxembourg
2010s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Luxembourg
2020s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Congo or Luxembourg?: Luxembourg, at 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0002 million USD per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Congo and Luxembourg?: 0.0001 million USD per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Congo ranks 140th and Luxembourg ranks 137th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Luxembourg: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/congo-rep/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/congo-rep/luxembourg/">Congo vs Luxembourg: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.