How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Philippines?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Egypt

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Philippines

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Egypt rank

112th

Philippines rank

111th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Egypt
Philippines

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Egypt, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 112th and Philippines ranks 111th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Philippines	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Philippines
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Philippines
1990s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Philippines
2000s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Philippines
2010s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Philippines
2020s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Egypt or Philippines?: Philippines, at 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Egypt as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Egypt and Philippines?: 0 million USD per person, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Philippines?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Egypt and Philippines rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Egypt ranks 112th and Philippines ranks 111th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/philippines/">Egypt vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.