How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Malta?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Greenland vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Greenland

0.0096 million USD per person

in 2024

Malta

0.0156 million USD per person

in 2024

Greenland rank

2nd

Malta rank

1st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Greenland
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0156 million USD per person against 0.0096 million USD per person in Greenland, a difference of 0.006 million USD per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.6 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Greenland ahead.

Greenland ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 1st of 180 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Greenland	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	Greenland
1980s	0.002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0019 million USD per person	Greenland
1990s	0.0036 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0034 million USD per person	Greenland
2000s	0.005 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0047 million USD per person	Greenland
2010s	0.0082 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.008 million USD per person	Greenland
2020s	0.0095 million USD per person	0.0033 million USD per person	0.0062 million USD per person	Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Greenland or Malta?: Malta, at 0.0156 million USD per person against 0.0096 million USD per person in Greenland as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Greenland and Malta?: 0.006 million USD per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Malta?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Greenland and Malta rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Greenland ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/greenland/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/greenland/malta/">Greenland vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.