How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and World?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Greenland vs World: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Greenland

0.0096 million USD per person

in 2024

World

0.0006 million USD per person

in 2024

Greenland rank

2nd

World rank

1st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Greenland
World

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.0096 million USD per person against 0.0006 million USD per person in World, a difference of 0.009 million USD per person.

That makes Greenland's figure about 17.2 times World's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

Greenland ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 180 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Greenland	World	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	Greenland
1980s	0.002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0018 million USD per person	Greenland
1990s	0.0036 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0034 million USD per person	Greenland
2000s	0.005 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0048 million USD per person	Greenland
2010s	0.0082 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0078 million USD per person	Greenland
2020s	0.0095 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.009 million USD per person	Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Greenland or World?: Greenland, at 0.0096 million USD per person against 0.0006 million USD per person in World as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Greenland and World?: 0.009 million USD per person, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and World?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Greenland and World rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Greenland ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs World: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/greenland/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/greenland/world/">Greenland vs World: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.