How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Suriname?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Guatemala

0.0006 million USD per person

in 2024

Suriname

0.0006 million USD per person

in 2024

Guatemala rank

56th

Suriname rank

54th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Guatemala
Suriname

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0006 million USD per person against 0.0006 million USD per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Guatemala ranks 56th and Suriname ranks 54th of 180 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Suriname	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Suriname
1980s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Suriname
1990s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	Suriname
2000s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Suriname
2010s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	Suriname
2020s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Guatemala or Suriname?: Suriname, at 0.0006 million USD per person against 0.0006 million USD per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Guatemala and Suriname?: 0 million USD per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Suriname?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Suriname rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Guatemala ranks 56th and Suriname ranks 54th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/guatemala/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/guatemala/suriname/">Guatemala vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.