How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Morocco?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs Morocco: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Guinea-Bissau

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Morocco

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Guinea-Bissau rank

96th

Morocco rank

98th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Guinea-Bissau
Morocco

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Morocco, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 96th and Morocco ranks 98th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea-Bissau	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Guinea-Bissau
1980s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Guinea-Bissau
1990s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Guinea-Bissau
2000s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Morocco
2010s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Morocco
2020s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Guinea-Bissau or Morocco?: Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Morocco as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Guinea-Bissau and Morocco?: 0 million USD per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Morocco?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Morocco rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 96th and Morocco ranks 98th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Morocco: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/guinea-bissau/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/guinea-bissau/morocco/">Guinea-Bissau vs Morocco: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.