How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and New Zealand?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guyana vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Guyana

0.0024 million USD per person

in 2024

New Zealand

0.0027 million USD per person

in 2024

Guyana rank

5th

New Zealand rank

4th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Guyana
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0027 million USD per person against 0.0024 million USD per person in Guyana, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 180 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guyana	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	New Zealand
1980s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	New Zealand
1990s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.001 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	New Zealand
2000s	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0013 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0013 million USD per person	0.0023 million USD per person	0.001 million USD per person	New Zealand
2020s	0.0017 million USD per person	0.0026 million USD per person	0.0008 million USD per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Guyana or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 0.0027 million USD per person against 0.0024 million USD per person in Guyana as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Guyana and New Zealand?: 0.0003 million USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and New Zealand?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guyana and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Guyana ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/guyana/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/guyana/new-zealand/">Guyana vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.