How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Zealand?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Iceland

0.0031 million USD per person

in 2024

New Zealand

0.0027 million USD per person

in 2024

Iceland rank

3rd

New Zealand rank

4th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Iceland
New Zealand

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0031 million USD per person against 0.0027 million USD per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0004 million USD per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

Iceland ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Iceland
1980s	0.0015 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0009 million USD per person	Iceland
1990s	0.0024 million USD per person	0.001 million USD per person	0.0015 million USD per person	Iceland
2000s	0.0025 million USD per person	0.0013 million USD per person	0.0012 million USD per person	Iceland
2010s	0.0029 million USD per person	0.0023 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	Iceland
2020s	0.003 million USD per person	0.0026 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Iceland or New Zealand?: Iceland, at 0.0031 million USD per person against 0.0027 million USD per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Iceland and New Zealand?: 0.0004 million USD per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Zealand?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Iceland and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Iceland ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/iceland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/iceland/new-zealand/">Iceland vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.