How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and New Caledonia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jamaica vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Jamaica

0.0007 million USD per person

in 2024

New Caledonia

0.0007 million USD per person

in 2024

Jamaica rank

35th

New Caledonia rank

32nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Jamaica
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0007 million USD per person against 0.0007 million USD per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Jamaica ranks 35th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 180 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Jamaica	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	New Caledonia
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	New Caledonia
1990s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	New Caledonia
2000s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	New Caledonia
2010s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	New Caledonia
2020s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Jamaica or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0.0007 million USD per person against 0.0007 million USD per person in Jamaica as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Jamaica and New Caledonia?: 0 million USD per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and New Caledonia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Jamaica and New Caledonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Jamaica ranks 35th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/jamaica/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/jamaica/new-caledonia/">Jamaica vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.