How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Rwanda?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Luxembourg

0.0003 million USD per person

in 2024

Rwanda

0.0002 million USD per person

in 2024

Luxembourg rank

137th

Rwanda rank

138th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Luxembourg
Rwanda

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0002 million USD per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per person.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 138th of 180 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Luxembourg	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Luxembourg
1980s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Luxembourg
1990s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Luxembourg
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Luxembourg
2010s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Luxembourg
2020s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Luxembourg or Rwanda?: Luxembourg, at 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0002 million USD per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Luxembourg and Rwanda?: 0.0001 million USD per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Rwanda?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Luxembourg and Rwanda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Luxembourg ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 138th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/luxembourg/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/luxembourg/rwanda/">Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.