How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tonga?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malaysia vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Malaysia

0.001 million USD per person

in 2024

Tonga

0.0009 million USD per person

in 2024

Malaysia rank

17th

Tonga rank

20th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Malaysia
Tonga

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.001 million USD per person against 0.0009 million USD per person in Tonga, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per person.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 17th and Tonga ranks 20th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 5 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malaysia	Tonga	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Malaysia
1980s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Malaysia
1990s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Tonga
2000s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Malaysia
2010s	0.0009 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Malaysia
2020s	0.0009 million USD per person	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Malaysia or Tonga?: Malaysia, at 0.001 million USD per person against 0.0009 million USD per person in Tonga as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Malaysia and Tonga?: 0.0001 million USD per person, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tonga?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Tonga rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Malaysia ranks 17th and Tonga ranks 20th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/malaysia/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/malaysia/tonga/">Malaysia vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.