Myanmar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Myanmar
0.0001 million USD per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0001 million USD per person
in 2024
Myanmar rank
164th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
165th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Myanmar
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00000197019972024

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0.0001 million USD per person against 0.0001 million USD per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 164th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 165th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Myanmar
1980s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0003 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person Myanmar
2020s 0.0003 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Myanmar or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Myanmar, at 0.0001 million USD per person against 0.0001 million USD per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Myanmar and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 million USD per person, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Myanmar and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Myanmar ranks 164th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/myanmar/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/myanmar/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Myanmar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit
million USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.