How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Zealand vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

New Zealand

0.0027 million USD per person

in 2024

Uruguay

0.0019 million USD per person

in 2024

New Zealand rank

4th

Uruguay rank

7th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

New Zealand
Uruguay

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0027 million USD per person against 0.0019 million USD per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Uruguay's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 7th of 180 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Zealand	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	New Zealand
1980s	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	New Zealand
1990s	0.001 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	New Zealand
2000s	0.0013 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0008 million USD per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0023 million USD per person	0.0012 million USD per person	0.0011 million USD per person	New Zealand
2020s	0.0026 million USD per person	0.0015 million USD per person	0.001 million USD per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, New Zealand or Uruguay?: New Zealand, at 0.0027 million USD per person against 0.0019 million USD per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between New Zealand and Uruguay?: 0.0008 million USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: New Zealand ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 7th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/new-zealand/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/new-zealand/uruguay/">New Zealand vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.