Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per
Papua New Guinea
0.0006 million USD per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.0005 million USD per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
65th
Serbia rank
66th
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0006 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in Serbia, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Serbia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 66th of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 million USD per person | 0.0005 million USD per person | 0.0003 million USD per person | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0.0002 million USD per person | 0.0003 million USD per person | 0.0001 million USD per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0004 million USD per person | 0.0004 million USD per person | 0 million USD per person | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0005 million USD per person | 0.0006 million USD per person | 0.0001 million USD per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Papua New Guinea or Serbia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 0.0006 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
- 0.0001 million USD per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Serbia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 66th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.