How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and South Sudan?

17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Singapore vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Singapore

0 million USD per person

in 2024

South Sudan

0 million USD per person

in 2024

Singapore rank

177th

South Sudan rank

178th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Singapore
South Sudan

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.

Singapore ranks 177th and South Sudan ranks 178th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Singapore	South Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	South Sudan
2010s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	South Sudan
2020s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Singapore or South Sudan?: Singapore, at 0 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Singapore and South Sudan?: 0 million USD per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and South Sudan?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Singapore and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Singapore ranks 177th and South Sudan ranks 178th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/singapore/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/singapore/south-sudan/">Singapore vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.