Angola vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Angola
0.0108 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0109 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
142nd
New Caledonia rank
141st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Angola
  • New Caledonia
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0108 million USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Angola ranks 142nd and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 180 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0037 million USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0085 million USD per square kilometre 0.0106 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Angola or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0108 million USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Angola and New Caledonia?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and New Caledonia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and New Caledonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Angola ranks 142nd and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/new-caledonia/">Angola vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.