Argentina vs Belize: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Argentina
0.014 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize
0.013 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
131st
Belize rank
134th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Argentina
  • Belize
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.014 million USD per square kilometre against 0.013 million USD per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 0.001 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 131st and Belize ranks 134th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Belize in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Belize Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.0047 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.0058 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Belize
2010s 0.0119 million USD per square kilometre 0.008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.0128 million USD per square kilometre 0.0096 million USD per square kilometre 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Argentina or Belize?
Argentina, at 0.014 million USD per square kilometre against 0.013 million USD per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Argentina and Belize?
0.001 million USD per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belize?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Belize rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Argentina ranks 131st and Belize ranks 134th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Belize: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/belize/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/belize/">Argentina vs Belize: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.