How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Poland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Armenia

0.0724 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Poland

0.0726 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Armenia rank

54th

Poland rank

53rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Armenia
Poland

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.0726 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0724 million USD per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.

Armenia ranks 54th and Poland ranks 53rd of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Poland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0177 million USD per square kilometre	0.022 million USD per square kilometre	0.0042 million USD per square kilometre	Poland
2000s	0.0356 million USD per square kilometre	0.0292 million USD per square kilometre	0.0063 million USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2010s	0.0642 million USD per square kilometre	0.0481 million USD per square kilometre	0.0161 million USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2020s	0.0623 million USD per square kilometre	0.0594 million USD per square kilometre	0.0029 million USD per square kilometre	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Armenia or Poland?: Poland, at 0.0726 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0724 million USD per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Armenia and Poland?: 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Armenia ranks 54th and Poland ranks 53rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Poland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/poland/">Armenia vs Poland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.