How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Portugal?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Armenia

0.0724 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Portugal

0.0669 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Armenia rank

54th

Portugal rank

57th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Armenia
Portugal

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0.0724 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0669 million USD per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.

Armenia ranks 54th and Portugal ranks 57th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0177 million USD per square kilometre	0.0558 million USD per square kilometre	0.0381 million USD per square kilometre	Portugal
2000s	0.0356 million USD per square kilometre	0.0484 million USD per square kilometre	0.0128 million USD per square kilometre	Portugal
2010s	0.0642 million USD per square kilometre	0.0482 million USD per square kilometre	0.016 million USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2020s	0.0623 million USD per square kilometre	0.0586 million USD per square kilometre	0.0037 million USD per square kilometre	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Armenia or Portugal?: Armenia, at 0.0724 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0669 million USD per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Armenia and Portugal?: 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Portugal?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Portugal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Armenia ranks 54th and Portugal ranks 57th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/portugal/">Armenia vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.