Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time
- Aruba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.006 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 158th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 155th of 180 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1980s | 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1990s | 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0058 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre | 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.006 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
- Aruba ranks 158th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 155th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.