How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Czechia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Czechia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Austria

0.0804 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Czechia

0.077 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Austria rank

48th

Czechia rank

50th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Austria
Czechia

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.0804 million USD per square kilometre against 0.077 million USD per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 48th and Czechia ranks 50th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Czechia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Czechia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0536 million USD per square kilometre	0.0287 million USD per square kilometre	0.0249 million USD per square kilometre	Austria
2000s	0.0523 million USD per square kilometre	0.0393 million USD per square kilometre	0.013 million USD per square kilometre	Austria
2010s	0.0625 million USD per square kilometre	0.0589 million USD per square kilometre	0.0036 million USD per square kilometre	Austria
2020s	0.0716 million USD per square kilometre	0.0719 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Austria or Czechia?: Austria, at 0.0804 million USD per square kilometre against 0.077 million USD per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Austria and Czechia?: 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Czechia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Austria and Czechia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Austria ranks 48th and Czechia ranks 50th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Czechia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/austria/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/austria/czechia/">Austria vs Czechia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.