Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Bangladesh
0.3576 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.2767 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
4th
Mauritius rank
7th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mauritius
00.10.20.30.4197019962023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.3576 million USD per square kilometre against 0.2767 million USD per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0809 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0273 million USD per square kilometre 0.0647 million USD per square kilometre 0.0374 million USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0502 million USD per square kilometre 0.0836 million USD per square kilometre 0.0334 million USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0721 million USD per square kilometre 0.1491 million USD per square kilometre 0.077 million USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0977 million USD per square kilometre 0.1594 million USD per square kilometre 0.0616 million USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.2368 million USD per square kilometre 0.1991 million USD per square kilometre 0.0377 million USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 0.3614 million USD per square kilometre 0.2188 million USD per square kilometre 0.1426 million USD per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Bangladesh or Mauritius?
Bangladesh, at 0.3576 million USD per square kilometre against 0.2767 million USD per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Bangladesh and Mauritius?
0.0809 million USD per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mauritius?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Mauritius rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Bangladesh ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/mauritius/">Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.