Belarus vs Georgia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Belarus
0.0257 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
0.0264 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
111th
Georgia rank
108th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
0.010.020.03199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0264 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0257 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Belarus ranks 111th and Georgia ranks 108th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre 0.0226 million USD per square kilometre 0.0112 million USD per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0131 million USD per square kilometre 0.0145 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0225 million USD per square kilometre 0.0196 million USD per square kilometre 0.0028 million USD per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0248 million USD per square kilometre 0.0223 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Belarus or Georgia?
Georgia, at 0.0264 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0257 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Belarus and Georgia?
0.0007 million USD per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Belarus ranks 111th and Georgia ranks 108th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.