How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Latvia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Belarus

0.0257 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

0.0261 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

111th

Latvia rank

109th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Belarus
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0257 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 109th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0115 million USD per square kilometre	0.0072 million USD per square kilometre	0.0043 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.0131 million USD per square kilometre	0.0104 million USD per square kilometre	0.0027 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.0225 million USD per square kilometre	0.0167 million USD per square kilometre	0.0058 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.0248 million USD per square kilometre	0.0262 million USD per square kilometre	0.0014 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Belarus or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0257 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Belarus and Latvia?: 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Latvia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Latvia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Belarus ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 109th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/latvia/">Belarus vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.