Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Belize
0.013 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0125 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
134th
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Belize
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0.013 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0125 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 134th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Belize
1980s 0.002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre Belize
1990s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre Belize
2000s 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre Belize
2010s 0.008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.001 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0096 million USD per square kilometre 0.012 million USD per square kilometre 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
Belize, at 0.013 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0125 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0005 million USD per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Belize ranks 134th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/equatorial-guinea/">Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.