Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0252 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.0227 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
112th
Nicaragua rank
115th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Nicaragua
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0252 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0227 million USD per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and Nicaragua ranks 115th of 180 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0121 million USD per square kilometre 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0176 million USD per square kilometre 0.0087 million USD per square kilometre 0.0089 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0218 million USD per square kilometre 0.0158 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0237 million USD per square kilometre 0.0197 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Nicaragua?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0252 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0227 million USD per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nicaragua?
0.0025 million USD per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nicaragua?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nicaragua rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and Nicaragua ranks 115th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/nicaragua/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.