How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Botswana

0.0005 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

South Sudan

0.0002 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Botswana rank

179th

South Sudan rank

180th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Botswana
South Sudan

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 2.7 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 179th and South Sudan ranks 180th of 180 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	South Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	0.0001 million USD per square kilometre	Botswana
2020s	0.0006 million USD per square kilometre	0.0002 million USD per square kilometre	0.0003 million USD per square kilometre	Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Botswana or South Sudan?: Botswana, at 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Botswana and South Sudan?: 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Botswana and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Botswana ranks 179th and South Sudan ranks 180th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/south-sudan/">Botswana vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.