How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zambia?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Botswana

0.0005 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0.0011 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Botswana rank

179th

Zambia rank

176th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Botswana
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 2.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 179th and Zambia ranks 176th of 180 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	0.0002 million USD per square kilometre	Zambia
1980s	0.0002 million USD per square kilometre	0.0006 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Zambia
1990s	0.0003 million USD per square kilometre	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	Zambia
2000s	0.0003 million USD per square kilometre	0.0016 million USD per square kilometre	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	Zambia
2010s	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	0.0022 million USD per square kilometre	0.0017 million USD per square kilometre	Zambia
2020s	0.0006 million USD per square kilometre	0.001 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Botswana or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Botswana and Zambia?: 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zambia?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Botswana ranks 179th and Zambia ranks 176th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zambia/">Botswana vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.