Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Burkina Faso
0.0121 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0119 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
138th
Iceland rank
139th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Iceland
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0121 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0119 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 138th and Iceland ranks 139th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre 0.0037 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0107 million USD per square kilometre 0.0096 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 0.0122 million USD per square kilometre 0.0113 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Burkina Faso or Iceland?
Burkina Faso, at 0.0121 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0119 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Burkina Faso and Iceland?
0.0002 million USD per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Burkina Faso ranks 138th and Iceland ranks 139th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/">Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.