How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Chad

0.0048 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

0.0043 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

160th

Kazakhstan rank

163rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Chad
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Chad ranks 160th and Kazakhstan ranks 163rd of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	0.0011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	0.0014 million USD per square kilometre	0.0001 million USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	0.0035 million USD per square kilometre	0.0031 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Chad
2020s	0.0044 million USD per square kilometre	0.0039 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Chad or Kazakhstan?: Chad, at 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Chad and Kazakhstan?: 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chad and Kazakhstan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Chad ranks 160th and Kazakhstan ranks 163rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/">Chad vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.