How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Eritrea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Congo

0.004 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Eritrea

0.0033 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

164th

Eritrea rank

166th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Congo
Eritrea

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.004 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and Eritrea ranks 166th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Eritrea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	0.0014 million USD per square kilometre	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	Eritrea
2000s	0.0009 million USD per square kilometre	0.0014 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Eritrea
2010s	0.0023 million USD per square kilometre	0.0029 million USD per square kilometre	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	Eritrea
2020s	0.0038 million USD per square kilometre	0.0033 million USD per square kilometre	0.0006 million USD per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Congo or Eritrea?: Congo, at 0.004 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Congo and Eritrea?: 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Congo ranks 164th and Eritrea ranks 166th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eritrea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/eritrea/">Congo vs Eritrea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.