How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Congo

0.004 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

0.0043 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

164th

Kazakhstan rank

163rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Congo
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre against 0.004 million USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and Kazakhstan ranks 163rd of 180 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	0.0011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.0009 million USD per square kilometre	0.0014 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	0.0023 million USD per square kilometre	0.0031 million USD per square kilometre	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	0.0038 million USD per square kilometre	0.0039 million USD per square kilometre	0.0001 million USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Congo or Kazakhstan?: Kazakhstan, at 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre against 0.004 million USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Congo and Kazakhstan?: 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Congo ranks 164th and Kazakhstan ranks 163rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kazakhstan/">Congo vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.