Congo vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Congo
0.004 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
0.0038 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
164th
San Marino rank
165th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Congo
  • San Marino
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.004 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was San Marino ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and San Marino ranks 165th of 180 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo San Marino Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
1980s 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
1990s 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0052 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0083 million USD per square kilometre 0.0073 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre 0.0058 million USD per square kilometre 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Congo or San Marino?
Congo, at 0.004 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Congo and San Marino?
0.0002 million USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and San Marino?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and San Marino rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Congo ranks 164th and San Marino ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/san-marino/">Congo vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.