How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Congo

0.004 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0032 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

164th

Zimbabwe rank

167th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Congo
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.004 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	0.0014 million USD per square kilometre	0.001 million USD per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	0.0029 million USD per square kilometre	0.0022 million USD per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	0.004 million USD per square kilometre	0.0032 million USD per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.0009 million USD per square kilometre	0.0035 million USD per square kilometre	0.0026 million USD per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0023 million USD per square kilometre	0.004 million USD per square kilometre	0.0018 million USD per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0038 million USD per square kilometre	0.0046 million USD per square kilometre	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Congo or Zimbabwe?: Congo, at 0.004 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Congo and Zimbabwe?: 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Congo ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.