Costa Rica vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Costa Rica
0.0644 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
0.0669 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
59th
Portugal rank
57th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Portugal
00.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.0669 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0644 million USD per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 59th and Portugal ranks 57th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre 0.0398 million USD per square kilometre 0.0323 million USD per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre 0.0501 million USD per square kilometre 0.0367 million USD per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0252 million USD per square kilometre 0.0581 million USD per square kilometre 0.0329 million USD per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0341 million USD per square kilometre 0.0484 million USD per square kilometre 0.0143 million USD per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.0512 million USD per square kilometre 0.0482 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0573 million USD per square kilometre 0.0586 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Costa Rica or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.0669 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0644 million USD per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Costa Rica and Portugal?
0.0025 million USD per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Portugal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Costa Rica ranks 59th and Portugal ranks 57th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/portugal/">Costa Rica vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.