How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Denmark?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Denmark: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Czechia

0.077 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Denmark

0.077 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Czechia rank

50th

Denmark rank

49th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Czechia
Denmark

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.077 million USD per square kilometre against 0.077 million USD per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Denmark ahead.

Czechia ranks 50th and Denmark ranks 49th of 180 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Denmark	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0287 million USD per square kilometre	0.107 million USD per square kilometre	0.0783 million USD per square kilometre	Denmark
2000s	0.0393 million USD per square kilometre	0.0839 million USD per square kilometre	0.0446 million USD per square kilometre	Denmark
2010s	0.0589 million USD per square kilometre	0.1006 million USD per square kilometre	0.0417 million USD per square kilometre	Denmark
2020s	0.0719 million USD per square kilometre	0.0941 million USD per square kilometre	0.0221 million USD per square kilometre	Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Czechia or Denmark?: Denmark, at 0.077 million USD per square kilometre against 0.077 million USD per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Czechia and Denmark?: 0 million USD per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Denmark?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Denmark rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Czechia ranks 50th and Denmark ranks 49th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Denmark: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/denmark/">Czechia vs Denmark: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.