Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Djibouti
0.0026 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Djibouti
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Djibouti or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Djibouti ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/zimbabwe/">Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.