How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iraq?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Iraq: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Estonia

0.0186 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Iraq

0.0162 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Estonia rank

122nd

Iraq rank

125th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Estonia
Iraq

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0186 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0162 million USD per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 122nd and Iraq ranks 125th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Iraq in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	Iraq	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0054 million USD per square kilometre	0.0025 million USD per square kilometre	0.0029 million USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2000s	0.011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0073 million USD per square kilometre	0.0037 million USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2010s	0.0164 million USD per square kilometre	0.0188 million USD per square kilometre	0.0024 million USD per square kilometre	Iraq
2020s	0.0179 million USD per square kilometre	0.0171 million USD per square kilometre	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Estonia or Iraq?: Estonia, at 0.0186 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0162 million USD per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Estonia and Iraq?: 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iraq?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Iraq rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Estonia ranks 122nd and Iraq ranks 125th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Iraq: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/iraq/">Estonia vs Iraq: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.