How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Myanmar?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Estonia

0.0186 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Myanmar

0.0194 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Estonia rank

122nd

Myanmar rank

121st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Estonia
Myanmar

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0.0194 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0186 million USD per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 122nd and Myanmar ranks 121st of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	Myanmar	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0054 million USD per square kilometre	0.0066 million USD per square kilometre	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	Myanmar
2000s	0.011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0102 million USD per square kilometre	0.0008 million USD per square kilometre	Estonia
2010s	0.0164 million USD per square kilometre	0.0258 million USD per square kilometre	0.0095 million USD per square kilometre	Myanmar
2020s	0.0179 million USD per square kilometre	0.0256 million USD per square kilometre	0.0077 million USD per square kilometre	Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Estonia or Myanmar?: Myanmar, at 0.0194 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0186 million USD per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Estonia and Myanmar?: 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Myanmar?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Myanmar rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Estonia ranks 122nd and Myanmar ranks 121st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/myanmar/">Estonia vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.