Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Eswatini
0.022 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.02 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
117th
Solomon Islands rank
120th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Solomon Islands
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.022 million USD per square kilometre against 0.02 million USD per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.002 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Solomon Islands ranks 120th of 180 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0044 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0077 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0079 million USD per square kilometre 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0167 million USD per square kilometre 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre 0.0105 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0242 million USD per square kilometre 0.0158 million USD per square kilometre 0.0085 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0219 million USD per square kilometre 0.0192 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Eswatini or Solomon Islands?
Eswatini, at 0.022 million USD per square kilometre against 0.02 million USD per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Eswatini and Solomon Islands?
0.002 million USD per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Solomon Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Solomon Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Eswatini ranks 117th and Solomon Islands ranks 120th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/solomon-islands/">Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.