How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ukraine?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Ukraine: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Eswatini

0.022 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Ukraine

0.0228 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini rank

117th

Ukraine rank

114th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Eswatini
Ukraine

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 0.0228 million USD per square kilometre against 0.022 million USD per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Ukraine ranks 114th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Ukraine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0082 million USD per square kilometre	0.0143 million USD per square kilometre	0.0061 million USD per square kilometre	Ukraine
2000s	0.0167 million USD per square kilometre	0.0128 million USD per square kilometre	0.0039 million USD per square kilometre	Eswatini
2010s	0.0242 million USD per square kilometre	0.022 million USD per square kilometre	0.0022 million USD per square kilometre	Eswatini
2020s	0.0219 million USD per square kilometre	0.0274 million USD per square kilometre	0.0055 million USD per square kilometre	Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Eswatini or Ukraine?: Ukraine, at 0.0228 million USD per square kilometre against 0.022 million USD per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Eswatini and Ukraine?: 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ukraine?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Ukraine rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Eswatini ranks 117th and Ukraine ranks 114th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Ukraine: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ukraine/">Eswatini vs Ukraine: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.