How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

French Polynesia vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

French Polynesia

0.0483 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

0.0468 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

French Polynesia rank

75th

Serbia rank

77th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

French Polynesia
Serbia

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0483 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0468 million USD per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 77th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	French Polynesia	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0472 million USD per square kilometre	0.0343 million USD per square kilometre	0.013 million USD per square kilometre	French Polynesia
2010s	0.0478 million USD per square kilometre	0.0349 million USD per square kilometre	0.0129 million USD per square kilometre	French Polynesia
2020s	0.0455 million USD per square kilometre	0.0458 million USD per square kilometre	0.0002 million USD per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, French Polynesia or Serbia?: French Polynesia, at 0.0483 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0468 million USD per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between French Polynesia and Serbia?: 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Serbia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: French Polynesia ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 77th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/serbia/">French Polynesia vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.