Gambia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Gambia
0.0551 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0515 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
67th
New Zealand rank
70th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Gambia
  • New Zealand
00.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0551 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0515 million USD per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 67th and New Zealand ranks 70th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0171 million USD per square kilometre 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre 0.0118 million USD per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.0256 million USD per square kilometre 0.0083 million USD per square kilometre 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre 0.0156 million USD per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 0.0333 million USD per square kilometre 0.021 million USD per square kilometre 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 0.0355 million USD per square kilometre 0.0409 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0477 million USD per square kilometre 0.0491 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Gambia or New Zealand?
Gambia, at 0.0551 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0515 million USD per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Gambia and New Zealand?
0.0036 million USD per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Gambia and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Gambia ranks 67th and New Zealand ranks 70th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/new-zealand/">Gambia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.