How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Slovenia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Gambia

0.0551 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Slovenia

0.0522 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Gambia rank

67th

Slovenia rank

69th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Gambia
Slovenia

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0551 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0522 million USD per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Gambia ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 69th of 180 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0299 million USD per square kilometre	0.0365 million USD per square kilometre	0.0066 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2000s	0.0333 million USD per square kilometre	0.0389 million USD per square kilometre	0.0056 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2010s	0.0355 million USD per square kilometre	0.0449 million USD per square kilometre	0.0094 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2020s	0.0477 million USD per square kilometre	0.0499 million USD per square kilometre	0.0022 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Gambia or Slovenia?: Gambia, at 0.0551 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0522 million USD per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Gambia and Slovenia?: 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Slovenia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Slovenia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Gambia ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 69th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/slovenia/">Gambia vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.