How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Georgia vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Georgia

0.0264 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

0.0261 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Georgia rank

108th

Latvia rank

109th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Georgia
Latvia

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0264 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 108th and Latvia ranks 109th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Georgia	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0226 million USD per square kilometre	0.0072 million USD per square kilometre	0.0155 million USD per square kilometre	Georgia
2000s	0.0145 million USD per square kilometre	0.0104 million USD per square kilometre	0.0041 million USD per square kilometre	Georgia
2010s	0.0196 million USD per square kilometre	0.0167 million USD per square kilometre	0.003 million USD per square kilometre	Georgia
2020s	0.0223 million USD per square kilometre	0.0262 million USD per square kilometre	0.004 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Georgia or Latvia?: Georgia, at 0.0264 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Georgia and Latvia?: 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Georgia ranks 108th and Latvia ranks 109th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/latvia/">Georgia vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.