Greenland vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Greenland
0.0013 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0012 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
172nd
Namibia rank
175th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Greenland
  • Namibia
00.0010.0010.002197019962023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Greenland ranks 172nd and Namibia ranks 175th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Greenland
1980s 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Greenland
1990s 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Greenland
2000s 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Greenland or Namibia?
Greenland, at 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Greenland and Namibia?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Namibia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Namibia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Greenland ranks 172nd and Namibia ranks 175th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/greenland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/greenland/namibia/">Greenland vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.