Guinea-Bissau vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Guinea-Bissau
0.0293 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
0.0282 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
101st
Senegal rank
103rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Senegal
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0293 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0282 million USD per square kilometre in Senegal, a difference of 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 101st and Senegal ranks 103rd of 180 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0042 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0088 million USD per square kilometre 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0184 million USD per square kilometre 0.0145 million USD per square kilometre 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0256 million USD per square kilometre 0.0236 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Guinea-Bissau or Senegal?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0293 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0282 million USD per square kilometre in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Guinea-Bissau and Senegal?
0.0011 million USD per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Senegal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Senegal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 101st and Senegal ranks 103rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/senegal/">Guinea-Bissau vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.